Also from a hardware viewpoint, the mac option with fusion has allowed newer machines to be used. PatrickFaith wrote:I have moved a lot of both autodesk and foundry compositing to fusion, from an economics viewpoint for low budget it makes a lot of sense. Really calculate what you average IO is going to be for a normal assembly.Īnything that you can think of that would be a hang up? RAIDed NVMEs on an internal card can keep you flush for Caching. The IO for a Flame equivalent box is going to be a lot. Also get used to manually caching like you do in Houdini with Savers and Loaders. I think you're going to need more RAM than a Flame would use because of the way Fusion eats it for breakfast. You can do some cool things like set up render nodes to handle renders too but I tend to use Deadline if it's a big off load. Outside of that, I think everything else should be straight forward. The other new feature is the object warp tracker but the technique can be assembled using the Optical Flow vector tracking technique the Milo made a YouTube about. It's part of the Fusion page as well as the Color page but they haven't posted it to stand alone yet. The better features like AI depth map are only available in Resolve. You're going to have to learn DaVinci to replace a Flame. I would do a feature comparison to make sure everything is covered. Especially given how wonderful the flame roto process is, maybe someone else can pipe in on this? It seems that a lot of the nice roto stuff is still on the davinci/color tab, but I mainly work in fusion standalone since I prefer the composite files rather than the full davinci database. The only real thing I still struggle with is facial detailed roto's in fusion, i just have never felt comfortable in fusion doing this. Most of the other transition stuff I have actually learned to like fusion better, there's some nuke to fusion guides that are usuful that even helped me off of autodesk. For a transition to apple silicon mac, the prores alpha issues on fusion are pretty much a show stopper (you will need to switch to dnxhr). I have moved a lot of both autodesk and foundry compositing to fusion, from an economics viewpoint for low budget it makes a lot of sense. Has anyone on here done that? And advice or pitfalls to consider? Matt Collings wrote:I'm considering moving from Flame to Fusion for high end commercial finishing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |